Reply #102: Your "predictions" are actually the factual statements. [View All]

[newmajority]

And I think you know that, otherwise you wouldn't have mentioned them.

Hillary is expected to win. Obama himself has even said so. But her win will not be what was expected from PA, 6 weeks ago when Team Hillary moved the goalposts after Ohio and Texas didn't turn out to be the "blowouts" they expected either. Her 28 point lead has been shrinking consistently and she'll be lucky to get a win in single digits.

As far as electro-fraud voting goes, that's a given. It's all done on machines and there's no way to ensure accuracy. If you can actually defend that, then you are part of the problem. Massive turnout (which would likely favor Obama) can arguably reduce the electrofraud potential, but only if they actually VOTE. How many "glitches" will there be at polling sites, and will Rendell (an obvious Clinton/DLC partisan) actually have the balls to close the polls with thousands of people still waiting in line - because there aren't enough machines to handle the crowds efficiently.

And yes, a ballot without Obama's name on it is absolutely inexcuseable. Wonder what Rendell's spin on that is gonna be? :eyes: