You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: There certainly seems to be a double standard in effect for black politicians. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There certainly seems to be a double standard in effect for black politicians.
None of the examples you've suggested seem to me like reasonable comparisons. Romney's entire campaign was based on pandering to right-wing Christians as One Of Them; that made it inevitable that the fact that he was a Mormon would become a problem. It amazes me that no one on his staff realized that right-wing Christians want to vote for a Christian; but that's a completely different problem from the one the media has created for Obama.

Kerry was under attack for taking communion and being pro-choice. Opinion is divided on whether it is ethical or consistent with Catholic doctrine to deny politicians the sacrament on that basis, but in any case that's an instance of a politician being punished for publicly dissenting from his religion's established doctrine. If Obama was being pilloried in the media for having said that he didn't believe in the divinity of Christ but still worshipping in a Christian church, maybe that comparison would be meaningful. As it is, I think it's apples and oranges. Nothing in Christian doctrine obliges one to believe that America has been damned for its homicidal foreign policies or that AIDS is a government conspiracy.

I am not familiar with the Giuliani incident but I assume it has something to do with the fact that his well-known marital and sexual escapades would put him in the category of people who shouldn't receive communion, and yet he took it anyway. In that case, there's pretty much no relationship between his case and Obama's, for reasons given above.

When I see the media going after McCain because he hasn't publicly renounced the lunatic opinions professed by the right-wing Christian demagogues he's been quietly sucking up to for the past several years I'll reconsider your claim. I think it'll be a while, though.

The Plaid Adder

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC