You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: My guess is that his flippant answers to the press are the issue. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. My guess is that his flippant answers to the press are the issue.
It doesn't sound like that man is "who he was last year and 5,10,15 years ago" Several journalists who went to that church and/or had friends and family who did were really shocked by that press session. Many had never heard him talk the way he did in those clips either even though they attended pretty regularly and they talked about how his usual sermons went. He always has that style but not the topics or language.

Anyway the Q&A shocked them, both in some of the things he said and how rude he was. They didn't know him that way.
Wright had a very good reputation in Chicago, the church wasn't considered fringe he he was well respected.
But he was so disrespectful in that press conference. I understand he'd be angry at the skewed image he'd been given by the media and the horrible consequences (threats and hate mail to him and to the church) but he either shouldn't have done one yet or he should have used it to bridge some of the barriers. He knew the type of question he'd get.

Maybe he should have followed his own advice from that 9/11 sermon they asked about. He responded by saying they hadn't seen the whole thing and that Obama had no right to say he should have tried to bring peace, he hadn't seen the whole thing either, he did bring in peace. And he did. But instead of being angry when he answered he could have explained the sermon better and people would have it understood much better. Because after he talks about how horrible 9/11 was and asking God what the reaction should be and the horrid bible verse about revenge and the infamous crescendo part we heard in clip where he's talking about what that ambassador said on Fox about what we've done coming back to us...
He talked about asking God again and about reacting to violence with violence
God showed me that this was a time for me to examine my relationship with God, not time to examine others. Talk to God privately, spend time getting right with God- not trying to set others right. Make sure what you are doing is for the sake of eternity, not for the sake of the public. All of us need to start by setting right our relationship to God as our first step.

I'm thinking he forgot that and what he did was for the public, not for the sake of eternity. He was reacting to his own hurt, getting that revenge he warns against. To those who have known him 5,10,15 years ago that was not the man they knew.

Whoever we support I think it would have been nice had he replied more thoughtfully and patiently. This country needs a lot of healing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC