Reply #58: Then why WAS Clinton on that extended book tour in summer2004 and repeatedly DEFENDING Bush [View All]

[blm]

and why was Carville sabotaging Ohio Dem voters on election night?

And why did historian Douglas Brinkley remark on Clintons backstabbing Kerry throughout 2003-4 when he made an appearance at Depauw Univ. in 2004?



http://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=13354


http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/06/19/clinton.iraq/


http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/oct/07/did_carville_tip_bush_off_to_kerry_strategy_woodward


You really haven't a clue what Clintons have been about.
There protection of BushInc didn't just start with Bushboy, either.


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html



And further - Kerry won't be VP - he wants to open investigations into what has been done and wants President Obama's cooperation - something that Clinton refused when he deep-sixed so many of the outstanding matters that Poppy Bush and his cronies needed to be treated with secrecy and privilege.

Kerry could press a case if he wanted to, considering he is the one who has been helping Obama for over a year now and used the national political network he put together in 2003-4 to work for Obama to take on Clinton state by state.

But he will be a close advisor to Obama and you should get on your knees and be THANKFUL as a citizen that Kerry is still going to be in DC ADVOCATING for open government for you and every other citizen - especially since there are so few willing to risk themselves on those matters.

You should be thankful now. If not for Kerry's work in the senate, this nation would be in its second decade of full-on fascism by now.