You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #94: misleading [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #70
94. misleading
In this country - and this is important if we are to understand racism - no matter how much "white blood" a person has, they are still seen as "Black" by whites, based on superficial physical characteristics. White is seen as something "pure" and "uncontaminated" by "other races" - that notion is a critical and essential component of racism. Sadly, "bi-racial" still does not exist in our culture, unless the person is a descendant of parents from two "non white" races. If a person has superficial physical characteristics that whites associate with "Oriental" and superficial physical characteristics that whites associate with "Black," then they get confused, and that is when the term "bi-racial" is used to help whites keep things clear in their minds, and the reason for the need to keep things clear is to prevent any threats to white privilege. Whites can't "see" Caucasian features in a person who also has Black ancestors, because the power of "seeing" other races - and race is something imaginary that whites think they can "see" - overwhelms that. "White" to whites means no hint of anything associated with the "other" - and historically presumed to be lesser and inferior and subject - races. People are mistreated based upon appearance, and a person can have 90% white ancestors, and still be "seen" as Black by whites, and treated accordingly.

There is no such thing as racism that does not rest on the implicit premise that there is a "standard" or "pure" race by which other races can be contrasted and compared, and without privilege and status for the "superior" race, and without oppression and mistreatment for the less favored race.That is what racism is, and to strip from our understanding those components is to render the concept powerless and meaningless.

There can be no such thing as "reverse racism" and there is also no practical and functional "bi-racial" category that includes white parents or ancestors. Both of those are indicative of denial of racism or a misunderstanding of racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC