Reply #18: This reminds me [View All]

[The Doctor.]

of people who argue that there's no such thing as Anthropogenic Global Warming.

I present the facts and say that the science has been proven beyond a doubt. They turn around and claim that the science has been disproven beyond a doubt... the only difference?

They have no facts.

They somehow think that making the same claim as their "opponents" makes their argument just as valid. Unfortunately they seem to have no concept of the idea of supporting their position.

Again, I don't have a big problem with Clinton except for the obviously underhanded, irresponsible, and stupid things she and her campaign have done (which are proven), but her supporters not only seem to be blind to her transgressions, they pretend that Obama has committed worse with nothing to back it up.

Then we get threads like this one, where a Clinton person somehow thinks that an unreasoned, unsupported response to an Obama supporter's substantive thread is somehow 'valid'.

Well, like the AGW denialists who think that simply saying it's not true makes it untrue, this thread fails.