TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-18-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. The DUer expressed an opinion of the CANDIDATE and you ... |
|
Edited on Sun May-18-08 02:06 PM by TahitiNut
... attacked the DUer. A personal attack in response to the expression of an opinion is NOT civil or rational.
This has become common in this forum ... an apparent inability to maintain a MESSAGE focus and not a MESSENGER focus.
Example: DUerA: "I can't support Hillary." DUerB: "You're a sexist!"
Example: DUerA: "I can't support Obama." DUerB: "You're a racist!"
Throwing SHIT at the person expressing advocacy or opposition is a fallacy .. an ad hominem ... and betrays a fundamental flaw in one's reasoning processes.
A focus on the MESSAGE, however, can be valid ... even if there's an implication inherent in the analysis or deconstruction of that message.
Example: DUerA: "I can't support Hillary because she's a female." DUerB: "That's a sexist reason!"
Example: DUerA: "I can't support Obama because he's a black." DUerB: "That's a racist reason!"
See the difference? :shrug:
|