DemGa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-23-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. No, there were no lies |
|
The racism charges are false - assumption of intent is required.
There are no sexist acts committed by Clinton - more supposition.
The FLA and MI pledge was not violated by Clinton - and the quote lacks context.
Hillary vetoed the MI FLA solutions - so what? Assumption that the deal was fair.
She compared Obama to McCain? Obama has called Clinton "Bush/Cheney lite."
Again, you have to assume intent to "prove" Clinton lied.
|