You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #2: The difference is, in March it could be legitimately explained [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

RaleighNCDUer

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-28-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message

2. The difference is, in March it could be legitimately explained

as a calendar thing - she still had a potential of winning the primary.

Today, the same words take on a whole different aspect in that the ONLY way she can win the primary now is if 'something' happens to Obama - that puts the emphasis not on 'June' but on 'assassination'.

What was poor wording in March becomes catastrophic in May.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.