You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #123: None of those confirm the actual text of the speech [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #113
123. None of those confirm the actual text of the speech
A recently made ecstatic statement by a PR flack supporter doesn't carry much weight. It seems very strange that at an event organized by PR professionals which featured various politicians speaking, that no-one was filming or recording it.

Obama consulted with others before he spoke about possible political implications for when he began his campaign for the US Senate the following year, and he already had Axelrod advising him, and they rarely leave things to chance.

Obama was not mentioned in any of the news coverage at the time (excepting one with the 14 second video that Obama did not know about until much later). I think that is why he submitted it as a column weeks later to provide proof of his position at that time.

There are at least two versions that have been used by Obama and his sites. One version includes about a paragraph more than the other. There are a couple of other versions that were probably made by someone else.

Obama reportedly confirmed that the version in the column was written after the speech, based on Obama's recollection.

If a recording made on Oct 2, 2002 is ever found, we all better hope it matches his recollections almost verbatim. If not, the Repubs will go wild about it. When I first saw this thread title, I thought the Repubs had found such a tape.

There has already been suspicion and speculation that the speech had been tweaked slightly to benefit from events, debates, and public opinion during the weeks following the speech.

That is why this is an important question and an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC