You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whatever the result of the November election, Sarah Palin is the scariest politician to appear [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-08 07:39 AM
Original message
Whatever the result of the November election, Sarah Palin is the scariest politician to appear
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Fri Sep-05-08 07:58 AM by Douglas Carpenter
on the national scene in a generation.

It is entirely possible that this whole thing could fizzle out and even implode. I certainly hope so.

Even if Sen. Obama wins the Presidency and the short term goal fails, the extreme right might very well have found their voice.

Like many demagogues she has demonstrated an ability to wrap a right-wing extremist message in the language and imagery of working class populism to Orwellian levels - and she and her handlers are very, very good at it - so far, anyway.

MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT!! This is a VERY dangerous development, whatever the result of the November election!!

As I said, It is entirely possible that this whole thing could fizzle out and even implode. I certainly hope so. But ANYONE who is not at least deeply concerned about this is in denial!!!

Remember, Reagan sought and lost the Republican nomination in both 1968 and 1976. But he became the unifying figure of what emerged as the right-wing coalition which has now dominated the American political scene for a generation.

Before Ronald Reagan they had Barry Goldwater who lost in 1964 in one of the greatest landslides in American history. But he brought together the necessary elements to create this reactionary scourge which has so plagued our country and the world. At the time of 1964 most Americans considered Goldwater an extremist nut. "In your gut you know he's a nut." By the end of the 80's Goldwater was way too moderate and reasonable for the political movement he once led, a movement which came to dominate the American body politic.

I have a nightmare that whatever the result of the election, Sarah could very well emerge as the voice of the movement that Reagan once led and Goldwater was way too liberal to lead.

Again it is entirely possible that the whole thing could fizzle or implode. For the sake of the country and the world and the future of humanity, I certainly hope so. But, Reagan "could" have fizzled or imploded too, way back in the 60's or 70's, but he didn't. Now we are faced with someone who would make Reagan look like a Birkenstock socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC