You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: it would no more spark an outcry to remove them than any of the 100s of other judges [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. it would no more spark an outcry to remove them than any of the 100s of other judges
and other bush appointees who have terms that run past the end of his presidency, or the legitimacy of any legislation signed by chimpy etc.

So even if it could be proven that the election was stolen, the results, and the consequences, are not going to change retroactively. The Senate confirmed those nomineees. The Senate and House passed the bills chimpy signed. They're done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC