You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #76: Richardson made statements AFTER the invasion in favor of it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
76. Richardson made statements AFTER the invasion in favor of it
He wasn't in Congress - so he didn't have to vote. Senator Kerry spoke out against going to war if it was not a last resort several times - the two easiest to find were a speech at Georgetown where he spoke of not rushing to war given on January 23, 2003 and a December 2002 MTP. The Georgetown speech resulted in a David Frum, Bush speech writer, rant in National Review whining that they could never go to war slow enough to please Kerry, France and Germany. Kerry still had the same position after the invasion when the war was favored by 70% plus of the people.

Kerry risked having a political career to stand up to Nixon on the Vietnam War.

Kerry also fought Bush and Reagan on the illegal funding of the Contras and the covert war in Latin America. ( Richardson backed legally funding them - even though they were RW thugs - whose was afraid of peace here. http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=06&year=2008&base_name=assignment_desk_bill_richardso)

Kerry stood against EVERYONE in the power elite to investigate BCCI. Kerry has a record that he can be very proud of.

Find me three things where Richardson took positions anywhere near as strong. In addition Richardson was no profile in courage on the Wen ho Lee case. The fact is that Kerry has 24 years of FP experience - far more that Richardson - and they extent to the present. (You might want to look at what each did in proposing an exit to Iraq - Kerry's is pretty much everyone's now - Richardson's was an attempt to pander)

I actually hope Kerry stays in the Senate. He then preserves his independence and he is poised to be a very power Senator, who will likely be the author of landmark legislation - and it won't hurt that he has to friends in OBama and Biden. Kerry has a role model he can follow on this - Kennedy and he is a Fifth term Senator with the seniority needed to get things done. As one who has watched committee hearings - he has the respect of his peers. In my opinion, Kennedy has accomplished more real change as Senator than any Democratic President in the last 3 decades.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC