You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: I didn't mean that they were ugly women. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I didn't mean that they were ugly women.
Edited on Tue Nov-25-08 09:56 AM by Beacool
But they certainly weren't in their 20s when they ran.

Indira was 60 when she got elected and served a 3 year term (1977-1980) and she was 67 in 1984 when she again was chosen and was Prime Minister at the time of her assassination.

Golda was 71 when she was elected and served from 1969-1974.

So, definitely Hillary wouldn't be too old to be president in 2016.

As for looks, Hillary can hold her own:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC