You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: So should every form of entertainment get a sales tax subsidy? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. So should every form of entertainment get a sales tax subsidy?
A lot of people enjoy shopping as a recreational pastime. Should shopping malls get sales tax subsidies?

I don't know about you, but I was around here twenty-two years ago when the Metrodome was supposed to be the answer to all our sporting prayers. If it's not adequate, that's the team owners' problem, not mine.

My position remains the same. Baseball teams are a private business, not a public service. If there's that much demand for their games, then they should be able to build a stadium on their own dime, borrowing against current property or future earnings like every other business owner.

If there's not enough ticket revenue to support the stadium of their dreams, then they should scale back their plans and build a more modest stadium.

What especially frosts me is that our govt. officials seem to think it's perfectly okay to tax the citizens (and the amount is irrelevant) for the further profit of rich team owners, but when you talk about raising taxes for public services that help the working poor, then everyone (except the team owners) is supposed to be self-sufficient.

Just the other day, the head of the Metro Council absolutely nixed the idea of new revenue for Metro Transit. The legislature refuses to raise taxes to keep the working poor on Minnesota Care. But a stadium--ah, now we're talking! Public subsidies for the skyboxes of the wealthy!

That "quality of life" argument doesn't work with me. I'm old enough to remember Minneapolis before either the Twins or the Vikings came to town. In many ways, the quality of life was higher then than it is now: a superb school system, libraries that were open every day, a low crime rate, very low tuition at the U of M, never a word about cutting back on park maintenance, much less urban sprawl, frequent bus service, more local businesses instead of chain stores. No, I'm not saying that the advent of pro sports caused the decline. Not at all. I'm just saying that there's more to the quality of life than the presence of a pro sports team, and many of the factors that make up a high quality of life--for everyone, not just sports fans-- are doing very poorly at the moment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC