You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: I honestly don't know. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
euler Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I honestly don't know.
We'll have to show the disenfranshisement was intentional or planned.

It appears to me that around 70% of the resources are spent on trying to show that exit poll discrepancy proves fraud, or are spent on fraud research that depends on the notion that the exit poll discrepancy proves fraud. This effort is wasted.

If these resources can be shifted to real issues, we may be able to prove the disenfrancisement was planned and intentional.

The problem to me, as you point out with your statement that "Presumably Cam has evidence to substantiate that comment," is that presumably, she would release it if she had it. Why wouldn't she.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC