You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #127: What is your premise? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
super simian Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #101
127. What is your premise?
Hey, euler! :hi:

BTW did you ever answer the question about why you pretended to know who Cam Kerry is? Not that everybody has to know, my son is a very committed Democrat and didn't know, but he didn't pretend to know, either.

As to whether the bolding bothers a lot of people, I don't know, but you put it very well when you said it was a way to spin these findings (presumably) to promote your own point of view. Another poster down thread also makes the point that you can pick and chose which parts of the findings you want to emphasize to suit your own agenda and that in the end you may have done a disservice to these researchers.

You write: "They started from the premise that, the exit poll does not constitute prima facie evidence for fraud. But, it does not constitute prima facie against fraud either."

And that just about sums it up, doesn't it!

My point is about the premise that you start from, because that’s what you set out to prove, and I get the feeling that you are trying to prove that there was no election fraud. If not, why bring up a study that doesn't prove anything one way or another and then try to spin it so that it "proves" that the exit poll discrepancies are irrelevant?

My premise -- and I think I can speak for a vast majority of the posters on this forum -- is that there is a preponderance of evidence that suggests that the election was rigged to the extent that we now have the wrong president in the WH for 4 more years. But I mean <sarcasm> what's a wrong president now and then, could happen to any country </sarcasm>?

Well this particular wrong president lied this country into a war that is costing tens of thousands of Iraqi and American lives and billions of dollars that we could make much better use of and destroyed an entire country that we had no business destroying. Not only that, but his tragic policies established a climate that condoned torture and broke international laws established at the Geneva Conventions and destroyed any moral authority this county had or may ever have again to bring democracy to the dark corners of the world. He has also set about destroying public education, dismantling the infrastructure of this country, abridging our civil liberties, and attempting to rewrite the Constitution so that it serves the agenda of the neoconservative religious right. In fact, we are closer to fascism than we have ever been as a nation, and may be already there.

So this is a very serious case of oops the wrong president and this is why so many of us are so upset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC