You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #139: I'll just respond to your points and then [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #123
139. I'll just respond to your points and then
suggest how this argument could be settled.

Again, I don't care that much what credentials these people have. Anton Scalia is widely regarded as a brilliant jurist with impeccable credentials, but at the same time his opinion in Bush v. Gore is widely ridiculed by knowledgeable legal scholars as one of the two or three worst Supreme Court decisions in its history. And as far as one of these guys saying that more Florida voters intended to vote for Gore than Bush in 2000, that's a no-brainer and certainly doesn't qualify him as a liberal.

If you don't believe that pre-election polls are designed to predict winners (or rather predict where the race stands at that moment), why on earth do both parties and the media conduct so damn many of them? Do you really think that there is another reason for doing them?

If the reason that Mitofsky hasn't released the raw numbers is because they are meaningless, that certainly doesn't explain why he won't release his own detailed interpretation of the numbers. If his objective was to prevent misinterpretation of his poll, that is exactly what he would do. Anyhow, I didn't exactly say that he was lying. Let's just say that I think that he's evading and "spinning".

I scanned through the link that you provided, and I didn't see what quotes from Mitofsky support your argument that he has been consistent in his pronouncements. If you could point me to a particular page that you think makes that point, that would be helpful.

Anyhow, what I think would at least partially settle this argument would be to see the results of Mitofsky's polls, and their comparison with actual results, since he has been in the business: Presidential polls, Senate, House, Gubernatorial -- I don't know exactly what polls he's done, but I'm sure that there are a considerable number.

I suspect that it would be very difficult if not impossible to get hold of this information, otherwise we would have seen it posted by now. But I think that that information would answer a lot of questions and also make a lot of the other arguments on both sides of the issue trivial by comparison.

So please let me know if you have any idea of how to get this information. I would love to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC