You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: Are you saying that the ballots cast at the satellites AND the Absentees [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Are you saying that the ballots cast at the satellites AND the Absentees
were all counted manually? I.e., ALL Early Voting ballots were counted manually?

Precinct count Op Scans (Diebold Accuvote OS) are still programmed via GEMS. You don't need to hack the hardware. Read on.

I agree that OpScan ballots are harder to screw up after they've been printed, but prior to that, the names can be easily be reversed on the ballot, but not in the database. This results in the vote totals being reversed in the database. Any way to find out when the Election Day ballots were printed?

Of course, the database totals can be altered after the election too.

Also (and this is a completely separate issue) could ballot rotation have been used to scan ballots in the wrong machines to reverse votes? I'm not sure how they are coded to prevent this. On the OH punchcards for example, it's done with a single header card for each precinct. Not very secure. Do you have ballot rotation in IA?

Other ways to exploit Diebold Accuvote Op Scans in GEMS are to turn off the error checking for over- and under-votes (which is actually OFF by default!), and to set up a counting option called "Combined" which causes the straight-party as well as the cross-party candidate selection to be discarded if they are both selected for the same race. And again, this can happen without a warning to the voter. (I know there was only about a 0.25% undervote in the county though, and this was lower for the Election Day Ballots.)

Perhaps you are in a position to organize a recount of the Election Day ballots? They are paper and you can probably get some students to help you if you're at ISU. You could say it's for a thesis or something.

Consider that even though the winner of the Election Day Voting was Bush instead of Kerry, his margin was still quite a bit less than Kerry's Early Voting margin. This is NOT inconsistent with your hypothesis that Kerry really did do better in Early Voting than on Election Day. If the E-Day totals were swapped, Kerry would have won the day, but by a much smaller margin than in the Early Voting.

Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC