You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: The problem is with the assumptions regarding the "expected" votes [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. The problem is with the assumptions regarding the "expected" votes
the North Florida small Dixiecrat counties don't vote by party for President; only for local things

or thats what historic vote data shows


compare using party to set assumption of % vote versus my assumption

which is "if Dems have more new registrations between 2000 and 2004, they should have at least as much % vote in 2004 as 2000.

the Dixiecrat counties didn't meet my requirement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC