You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: NJ: County has to Dump Voting Machines. State wide Budget Consistency [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. NJ: County has to Dump Voting Machines. State wide Budget Consistency

Well, this county in NJ has to scrap some voting machines. It’s like this everywhere. HAVA is a nightmare. Also, of interest, in NJ, all counties have the same amount to spend on voting machines. Wonder why they did this;)

Voting machines must be replaced


http://www.newbernsj.com/SiteProcessor.cfm?Template=/GlobalTemplates/Details.cfm&StoryID=24182&Section=Local

October 19,2005
BY Charlie Hall
Sun Journal Staff
BAYBORO - Pamlico County had no ballot-counting glitches in the 2004 election, but the county still will have to scrap about $108,000 worth of voting machines.

Commissioners expressed their displeasure Monday night with the legislature's Aug. 26 law that requires counties statewide to use machines with a paper trail back-up.

Even with about $106,000 in state money to buy a requested 39 new machines and software, the county still must ante up about $50,000.
Working with a current budget that was cut to the marrow amid tight economic times for the county, the board will have to find revenue to pay for the new machines.

The new law came after 4,438 votes were lost in Carteret County and other glitches around the state left other races in doubt in 2004.
"I think the state is asking for something almost impossible," Chairman Doug Brinson said of the statewide demand.

"We haven't had a glitch like Carteret County," he added.
Commissioner Christine Mele echoed the frustration.
"There are 2,741 precincts (in the state)," she said. "It just ticks me off that out of all those, one precinct making a mistake has resulted in this."

Vendors supplying the machines have until Nov. 4 to make bids, with a decision on a one-year state contract coming Dec. 1. Public demonstrations will follow with commissioners getting their chance to view the options, with a Jan. 20 deadline to purchase.

"The period of time to see these (machines) for the first time and to make a decision is incredibly short," Mele said. "I am very reluctant to make that kind of decision in a month."

The new system must be in place by November 2006, but local elections boards are required to hold a test before the general election. Pamlico County will test the machines in the May 2006 primary.
"(Machines) are going to be required to have the same price across the state," said Deborah Todd, Pamlico County elections director. "The richer counties can't get it at a different price than the smaller counties."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC