You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #185: I think a lot of people misunderstand atheism/agnosticism [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #63
185. I think a lot of people misunderstand atheism/agnosticism
"Atheism denies divine being/beings but often goes beyond that by refusing to explore what those divine being/beings mean."

Wrong. We do refuse to explore what they mean, because they don't mean anything to us. They are just stories. They may or may not be true, and one may study them just as one may study a legend like Beowulf. To us they are no different. But we do not DENY them. There is no logical way to do so. You can't prove something's nonexistence.


"Agnosticism grants the possibility of divine existence, not atheism. "

No, they both do, but agnostics are more open to being proselytized, whereas atheists will have no part of it. An agnostic may want proof of a deity before he believes. An atheist isn't looking for proof. Personally, I'm content to find out what the "truth" is (if there is any) after I'm dead.

"Atheism closes itself off to the possiblities that the mysteries of the universe hold by refusing to consider the potential meanings behind the symbol."

No, we just don't think that there necessarily has to be a universal meaning to anything.


"Theism can certainly be a logical choice."

Of course, it cannot be. It requires a leap of faith that a given theology is the true one, and taking the risk that one might "burn in hell" for choosing the wrong religion. I don't think it is an irrational choice, because a faith that gives someone emotional comfort and stability can be a very positive thing. But it is in no way logical.

"It just depends upon what one considers "theism." A belief that Shiva is a literal being that has wondered the earth on occasion is illogical. A belief that Shiva is a symbol illustrating a deeper truth that is impossible to express in human terms is not illogical."

I don't have a problem with that, and I'm not sure if that really is "theism". It seems to leave open the idea that there is more than one "truth" that may hold for different people. I generally think of most religions as insisting that there is only one truth of the universe and that all others are false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC