You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is defense of the separation of church and state enough? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:18 PM
Original message
Is defense of the separation of church and state enough?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 11:28 PM by Heaven and Earth
I read Sam Harris' Atheist manifesto, and I realize that he does not speak for all atheists, but I did see many favorable comments attached to the thread containing it, so at least a few people did agree. Also, the suggestion of removing religion from 501(c)3 tax status, so that churches pay taxes, always receives many favorable responses.

Now, the rise of the religious right has put all liberals, religious or not, on the defensive regarding the separation of church and state. On that issue, I think that we are mostly united. I also understand that atheists have more of a problem with fundamentalists that those of us, while not fundamentalists, have a religious position closer to theirs.

Atheists/agnostics, is it enough that religious liberals defend the traditional understanding of church and state (pre-W)? Would you have us support it even further (churches paying taxes, or other new measures?) Or will we not be acceptable until we have renounced our faith and become atheists/agnostics as well? (When I say acceptable, I mean that some of the bitterness that I see in non-believers posts about faith won't be taken out on those who measure up to your standard, and the sentiments expressed in the manifesto mitigated)

Given the amount of conflict in this forum over basic believer/non-believer differences, as opposed to focusing on the First amendment and other progressive issues that unite us, I fear that it may be the latter, but I hope I am wrong. I like discussing theology as much as anyone, but when the discussions I read/participate in are clouded by the various issues people have before coming to the table, well, it may be more trouble than its worth.

I apologize if the above is incoherent. I am trying to put my feelings regarding the current state of affairs in this forum into words, and it may not be as clear as I would wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC