Reply #377: I do not claim that I can prove existence of God adequate for you [View All]

[papau]

I do claim that I can prove existence of God adequate for me.

So why is there a burden of proof on me that is not also on you if you are stating that there is no God?

And we both get to judge how adequate that proof is to ourself - RIGHT? or do you have the right to tell me that the proof that I am accepting is inadequate, while I can not tell you that you have not meet the level of proof that I demand for the statement there is no God?

Meanwhile is the playing field metaphysics - or science? And who gets to choose the playing field?