trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. We have no evidence of any of your claims. |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-19-05 02:13 PM by trotsky
We don't have the original first hand sources, even if they actually existed. Plus, those who would have compiled those first hand accounts had a vested interest in promoting their new religion - they absolutely cannot be said to have been unbiased. Thus, they cannot be legitimately trusted.
I think the snarkiness you detect can be expected when one goes off touting their own religious text as the best historical record, with only their own personal religious beliefs to support it.
|