Reply #11: That's kind of the point. [View All]

[trotsky]

Without first hand sources, and without any other points of view (all squelched by the early church), you can hardly be justified in considering your particular holy book accurate.

History is all about trying to figure out what really happened from the biased accounts of the victors. Sometimes there's enough to deduce it, other times there's not. Your point of view seems to be to trust the bible above all other sources, and worse, when evidence conflicts with your bible, assume the evidence is wrong.