You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #178: I don't understand this claim... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
SlackJawedYokel Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #177
178. I don't understand this claim...
You cannot prove things such as there are no smurfs.
Blasphemy aside, sure we can.
We *know* Smurfs are fictional characters created by some particular individual(s).
We can track this down quite easily.
How is this not "proof"?
Ok, it is *evidence* to be precise, but why can't this translate to a mathematical/logical "proof".

Seriously, I'm trying to figure out why this won't work.
Could some Philosophy authority please explain this for me?

Because, IMO, this is the exact same kind of evidence that humanity creates its gods... we just can't be as specific about *who* created them.

Cletus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC