You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Woo-woo Revoo [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Woo-woo Revoo
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 06:20 AM by onager
Novelist Michael Prescott reviewed this show when it originally aired in 2003.

He was irked that the show lacked balance. It didn't cover any REAL psychics!

Advice from Prescott: Just because some money is counterfeit, we can’t assume that all of it is.

No, but if I visit the Psykiks 'R Us Bank nine times and they give me counterfeit money, I don't need to try a tenth time.

Prescott has a simple explanation for why "real" psychics sometimes get caught cheating. The Weird Powers, after all, can't be summoned up on demand for us cranky skeptics. So under public pressure to perform, the poor fragile psychics sometimes resort to trickery.

In other words, it's all the fault of the non-believers. As usual.

This is the end of his article: After all, there’s one thing worse than being taken in by a fake psychic. It’s being in the presence of a genuine paranormal phenomenon – and thinking it’s a trick.

http://michaelprescott.freeservers.com/psychic.htm

If the name sounds familiar, Prescott got into a running Web-battle with James Randi a few years ago:

http://michaelprescott.freeservers.com/FlimFlam.htm

A similar documentary aired on FOX--of all places--back in 1998: The World's Greatest Hoaxes

Concentrated on Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, UFOs and alien autopsies etc. (Somehow they missed Judaism, Xianity, Islam, Hinduism, Mormonism, $cientology et. al. ...)

It has also been challenged by kooks all over the web, especially its treatment of the Patterson-Gimlin "female Bigfoot" video from 1967.

In reviewing the show, one woo wrote that the video quality was poor because Patterson "only had his old 8-mm home movie camera."

Actually, Patterson had a state-of-the-art (for 1967) 16-mm movie camera. How do we know that? Because he rented the camera, failed to return it, and the rental company issued an arrest warrant for him.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC