You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: No [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. No
Edited on Sat Jun-09-07 11:12 PM by Jack Rabbit
That is an awful put-down of Hud. You owe that fictitious character an apology.

Hud was an adult. He didn't think the world owed him anything, but he did believe it is a dog-eat-dog world and he was going to dine on the carcass of decent men like his father rather than be anybody's prey. I don't know what Bush would do if faced with the possibility of being stuck with a whole heard of cattle with hoof and mouth disease. We know what Hud would do: sell every head to anybody stupid enough to buy. "All I'm saying is let's get our bread in that gravy while it's good and hot." Every since I first saw the film, I can hear Melvyn Douglas' wraspy voice reply, "You're an unprincipled man, Hud."

Bush takes because he thinks he's entitled to it. Hud takes because he thinks that's the only way he, or anybody else, can have it. He knows that it, whatever it is -- his father's estate or Patricia Neal's snatch, is not his by entitlement. Hud is no more entitled to it than the next man's. It's not his until he take possession of it.

Hud is a pure nihilist. He believes in nothing and thus fights for nothing but his own self-interest. Bush, self-centered as he is, has some things he believes in, like some warped version of God and country where he, Bush, is God's anointed to lead America to smite God's evil-doing enemies, foreign and domestic. This gives Bush the delusion that while he serves his own selfish ends he is in fact serving a higher force in the cosmos. Hud had no such delusion. If there is a God, Hud figures, God would take care of Himself and probably does nicely. It was for Hud to take care of Hud.

ON EDIT

I have just read some of the other comments and wonder if those people have seen the film. Hud, directed by Martin Ritt (a badly underrated filmmaker, in my opinion) starred Paul Newman, Melvyn Douglas, Patricia Neal and Brandon de Wilde, all of whom were nomonated for Oscars (Ritt always got good performances from his actors; I once counted 17 Oscar nominations for acting performances in Ritt's films over the years).

Paul Newman plays Hud beautifully, but Hud is no hero. This is not a man to admire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC