This opened my mind, in a very big way.
Prior knowledge on WMD issueThere are
other sources too but the one above is comprehensive. Can a specific member deny prior knowledge?Sure. But we'd know that was a total bull shit excuse because they were all there, they talk to each other they have smart staffers who follow this stuff. It was like the vote on habeas corpus in 9/2006 or the FISA extension vote a few weeks ago - the Republicans are lock-step, right down the line and they piece off some Dems to legitimize it. It's one thing to take our liberties, it's another to take a whole lot of lives of civilians.
"They" do it, we don't but they do it in our name. I sick of it.
Good point on the the "one chance..." remark. I was being obscure or tired but the key info isn't right there. HRC is the one chance for Republicans to win because her negatives are so high and have been for so long. I don't know how solid her base is, those who say yes. I do now you have to win by a big majority (the "e-voting" disadvantage) to win by any majority. So how do you get from low 40's nationally to a plurality or majority? I can't see it happening given the negatives, which are a function of all the right wing hatched jobs but exist nonetheless. Point taken.
If it's not Gore, we're screwed royally, imho.