Reply #46: Evidence is not proof but it is evidence.. [View All]

[althecat]

Now that is a bit rude there. But lets ignore that. What standard of proof do you want precisely. We have:

Motive
Opportunity
Access
Footprints at the crime scene (strange numeric anomalies)
&
A public outcry and desire for investigation
Damage to the perception of voting system integrity (and there has been quite a lot of damage in that area already).

In this case there is a very simple way to settle the argument. Count the ballots. The argument seems to be that we should shut up because we cannot prove something and yet nor should anyone - it seems - bother to even look to see if its true. From the outset the beleivers in the system have made this unsupportable argument.

I personally do not know if there was Fraud in New Hampshire. I think the numbers are odd. I do not trust the computers. I think there should be a recount.

So Mr Totec....

You lay your cards on the table. Should there be a recount or not? If not why not?