You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #60: I lived in the SF Bay Area in the nineties on about 20K [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
60. I lived in the SF Bay Area in the nineties on about 20K
and was able to keep a several thousand dollar "cushion" in the checking account for emergencies. Granted I was in grad school, and knew that it was temporary (but that I would have to leave the area in order to work and begin to save and do things like buy homes and cars on nonprofit salaries, and I did that - it is a *choice* to do so). On those salaries I would agree that it would have been "working poor". However, even in the Bay Area - at least on the Penninsula (during the tech boom) I would NOT call 50K "the working poor" - those earning that, who were in working poor situations - had a spending/debt (choice) issue. I LIVED it - and if you choose to keep being insulting to others - than I can return the favor. If one lives in a very expensive market - DONT BUY A HOUSE unless the income allows it, then all of the extra expenses go to the landowner. I didn't buy until I lived where I could do so in a place where I would be able to SAVE enough to create a safety net in accessible funds to cover for all of the expenses (but the surgery) that you describe - and make sure that in my 50K job that I have health insurance.

Ironic - you define my income as on the edge of the "working poor" - yet from your postings, I would guess that I have a much greater securty net that I have saved to create.

To equate decent salaries to those of folks who are working at service jobs that pay 10 or less an hour (and who earn less than 20K unless they work two jobs) - is really blind to those that TRULEY struggle. Even at 20K in the Bay Area - with little safety network, I recognized that a) I was earning a high-power degree that would let me earn more later and give me job security and b) that there were many who were earning FAR less than I, and having to also live in the expensive SF Bay Area. I would suggest that your post indicates that you do not really *get* how many people live on significantly less than that in your area - and somehow survive - and that our concerns should be for HOW they survive. They could be we in a flick of a moment per employment opportunities, health crises with huge costs, etc. To over inflate what level is "crisis" or "working poor" (living on the edge - paying the way but with no cushion) - is to be very blind to the reality of many, many Americans living around you in the same high cost of living area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC