Reply #15: I think I understand what you're trying to ask. [View All]

[ebdarcy]

But, I could be wrong. So, I'll try to answer and I hope I make sense.

When I read or watch a program about the 60's, I'm amazed. It just seems like so much change was occurring. So many people were united, trying to make America a better place, trying to end an unjust war. I understand that it was extremely turbulent, and I know I will never be able to grasp the entirety of the 60's, but it just astounds me that so many people were trying. It's just not something I see today. It just seems like it was an amazing era.

Anyway, I think what you're trying to say is that living the whole thing and actually experiencing JFK makes it more real, that the depth of feeling is greater. And I agree with that sentiment. While I certainly understand something of the mystique, I'm not emotionally invested in it. I don't have the personal memories to draw from. When my mom talks about Bobby Kennedy, I can hear the emotion in her voice. It's tangible. It's not the same for me. I see the Kennedys, like FDR, as historical figures. So, while I admire them for what they did, for what they tried to do and for what they represented, I know it's not the same for me as it is for those who actually lived it. I didn't experience it, didn't hear the speeches in that climate, or in that context. So, the admiration I feel can't compare to the inspiration you feel. Also, my admiration for the Kennedys doesn't compare to the inspiration I get from my personal heroes. That's not to say that I don't have personal heroes from previous eras, it just means that John and Robert Kennedy don't mean as much to me as they could have and probably would have, had I lived during that time period.

So, I hope my answer made sense.

(And don't think of yourself as a geezer, think of yourself as wise and experienced.:) )