You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: I think the point is to blunt the power of incumbency. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the point is to blunt the power of incumbency.
Yes, it would be nice to have the option to re-elect good presidents for more terms.

But that is outweighed by the likelihood that mediocre or awful presidents get re-elected because of the power of incumbency. So, no, it's not to limit the good presidents, it's to limit the bad ones.

And I also think there might be a bit of "after two terms in power, even the best people get corrupted."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC