Unvanguard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
64. I'm not sure where I admitted that. |
|
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 09:17 PM by Unvanguard
I don't think it is (at least not in any relevant sense); my point from the start has been that the substantive "minority rights" objection being made to Prop. 8 has nothing to do with the measure in itself, but rather with the procedure laid out for such constitutional amendments in the California Constitution (which was open for abuse long before Prop. 8, and indeed has been abused before it.)
|