You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Bush's 50.7% was a mandate, yet Obama's 52% was not? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bush's 50.7% was a mandate, yet Obama's 52% was not?
I can't figure this out. It seems that the guy who won with the most progressive agenda in at least 15 years HAS a mandate to govern progressively. Whether the spineless weasels in Congress and that snake Emmanuel will let him is another story.

Still, if only by comparison to the last administration, this WILL be a more progressive era. I take comfort in that fact, even if the reality is that he may not be able to accomplish everything he wants or some people (Democrats in Congress) may get in the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC