You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: Look, I'm Not Defending Them [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Look, I'm Not Defending Them
They made lots of stupid mistakes and had a pattern of doing the wrong thing. That doesn't mean i think they were in cahoots with the oil companies, and i don't think the oil companies needed any partners.

Want some personal examples of things i thought GM did stupidly:
1) In 1997 the Buick division decided that all models would be 4 door. This instantly eliminated the 18% of the market that prefers coupes.
2) After not introducing new models for 12 years each, Olds and Buick both did. Both SUV's. 8 Years after EVERYONE was selling those.
3) GM, with the exception of the Corvette, for 15 years made NO convertibles. They ceded that market to Chrysler, who's 5th most successful model EVER is the Sebring and the 6th most successful is the LeBaron.

So, i'm not defending them at all.

And as to giving up market share, part of that was product quality, not just product offerings. While it's not an accurate statement anymore, and hasn't been for way over 10 years, the perception has been created that the cars are not as good. So, the eroding market share isn't just because of the mileage.

Look, i've got a 14 year old Buick with a 6 cylinder engine that still gets 28 miles to the gallon. For a luxury coupe, there was NO car on the market, by any company, that did any better than that when we bought in 1995. The Camry had a rated mileage that was 1mpg lower than the rating of the car we bought. So, it's simply not true that everything Toyota or Nissan or Honda makes gets better mileage than the GM stuff.

And if they weren't making what "sold", please explain to me the sudden proliferation of the SUV! And why did Nissan, Honda, Isuzu, and Toyota release that product variant? I'm not imagining how many SUV's are out there. And check out the market fractions of those companies in that product niche. GM and Ford are not trailing in that field. So, the American people did buy those unnecessarily huge things.

Last time: I'm not defending the operation of, or the decision making of, the american car companies. All i said was that the OIL COMPANIES couldn't care less about whether the US car firms live or die. Then, we're arguing about whether the car companies are evil or stupid.

That's not even how this whole thing started. I was talking about the oil companies.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC