Reply #23: Actually, in another branch of this thread [View All]

[Ms. Toad]

you have been vehemently arguing against me when I said, "A lot of it is food that would otherwise have been discarded - I believe a lot of the cost is in the "rescue" rather than the actual food cost." (Somehow you have twisted it into an assertion I never made that what Second Harvest does is provide outdated food, but nonetheless you have been insisting I was wrong.) Now you are agreeing with, and claiming credit, for saying that "distributing good, nutritious food that would otherwise end up in a dumpster is one of the oldest parts of the Second Harvest story" ??

I give up.