You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Question Geithner Refuses To Answer [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 05:02 PM
Original message
The Question Geithner Refuses To Answer
Advertisements [?]
The Question Geithner Refuses To Answer
http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-the-elephant-in-the-bailout-room-2009-3">The Business Insider

Tim Geithner did a good job on the Sunday talk-show circuit. He has survived his near-death experience of two weeks ago, and the betting odds that he'll be ousted by June have fallen back to 10%.

But there's one question he still refuses to answer. Why is he bailing out the people who lent trillions of dollars to our now-insolvent banks?

Each of the bailed-out institutions has tens or hundreds of billions of dollars that could be used to cover losses before the taxpayer had to cough up a dime. And with the exception of Lehman Brothers (and, now, General Motors), these gigantic pools of money have been protected to the tune of 100 cents on the dollar.

Who are these people?

The bondholders.

In any fair world, the bondholders would lose everything before any taxpayer money was put on the line. Ever since Lehman Brothers, however, Tim Geithner & Co. have been so afraid of a Lehman-repeat that they refuse to even publicly discuss the possibility of making bondholders share the pain. Whenever anyone suggests this idea, moreover, Geithner & Co. immediately dismiss it by saying it would lead to another Lehman.

At best, this is wrong. At worst, it's disingenuous.

The folks who lent money to AIG, Citi, etc., knew exactly what risks they were taking. It's time to at least discuss the possibility that they should have to answer for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC