That's fine. I don't know "statistics", but the core group of anti-choicers are after Roe and Griswald. Stick your head in the sand and whistle Dixie for all I care. It is good that so many people understand what is at stake here. Hopefully the anti-choicers won't win and it will all be a moot point. But falling back on the old "provide statistics or you are wrong and I am right" is a lame argument when so much is at stake.
But what is the point? You would prefer to believe anti-choicers are harmless. Your business. People that actually support reproductive rights understand the connection. I really wish you were correct, I loose sleep over the fact that you are absolutely wrong and birth control rights are very much in the cross-fire.
And of course the anti-Roe people don't think about all the women who would die in botched abortions if it were overturned have a right to their lives do they? Do those sweet innocent souls think there was no abortion prior to reproductive rights and all babies were loved and wanted and blessings and sunshine to all? Harmless my ass. Bunch of miserable hypocrits who sooth their souls by not delving too deep into reality and don't give a flying fuck about any "life" but their own pure sweet existence. Selfish, simply selfish and unintelligent.
http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2006/03/20/anti_contraception/index.htmlHere is a link to an article in Salon back in 2006 that talks about this issue.