You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: You can ignore them and stick your head in the sand [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. You can ignore them and stick your head in the sand
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 08:40 AM by get the red out
That's fine. I don't know "statistics", but the core group of anti-choicers are after Roe and Griswald. Stick your head in the sand and whistle Dixie for all I care. It is good that so many people understand what is at stake here. Hopefully the anti-choicers won't win and it will all be a moot point. But falling back on the old "provide statistics or you are wrong and I am right" is a lame argument when so much is at stake.

But what is the point? You would prefer to believe anti-choicers are harmless. Your business. People that actually support reproductive rights understand the connection. I really wish you were correct, I loose sleep over the fact that you are absolutely wrong and birth control rights are very much in the cross-fire.

And of course the anti-Roe people don't think about all the women who would die in botched abortions if it were overturned have a right to their lives do they? Do those sweet innocent souls think there was no abortion prior to reproductive rights and all babies were loved and wanted and blessings and sunshine to all? Harmless my ass. Bunch of miserable hypocrits who sooth their souls by not delving too deep into reality and don't give a flying fuck about any "life" but their own pure sweet existence. Selfish, simply selfish and unintelligent.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2006/03/20/anti_contraception/index.html

Here is a link to an article in Salon back in 2006 that talks about this issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC