You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Money, Money, Money, Money [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:27 AM
Original message
Money, Money, Money, Money
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sat Jan-16-10 10:38 AM by unhappycamper
Out of boredom I was watching the 20th Anniversary showing of Pretty Woman last nite. Since I haven't seen it for 10 years or so it was interesting.

When Richard Gere's shitball lawyer was going after Ralph Bellimy's ship building company, Gere wanted to reach out to a Senator on the Appropriations Committee and put a hold on the $375 million that was coming Bellimy's company.

So what was that $375 million for? A contact to build 10 destroyers.

Imagine that. $37.5 million dollars to build a destroyer. For Uncle Sam's Navy. Color me surprised.

Let's fast forward to 2008 when the first two DDG-1000 destroyers were built. These two destroyers came in at $10.5 billion dollars. Yup, you heard it right. Roughly $5.25 billion per destroyer. That's about 1,500 times more expensive than those 1990 destroyers. Needless to say, these two pigs in a pole will most likely be the last we ever see of the Zumwalt-class destroyers. Or our $10.5 billion dollars.

The Navy went back to building DDG-51 Arleigh Burke destroyers which were considerably cheaper than $5+ billion a copy. Now to wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleigh_Burke_class_destroyer

Development

In 1980 the United States Navy initiated design studies with seven contractors. By 1983 the number of competitors had been reduced to three; Bath Iron Works, Todd Shipyards and Ingalls Shipbuilding.<7> On 3 April 1985 Bath Iron Works received a US$321.9 million contract to build the first of class, USS Arleigh Burke. <11> Gibbs & Cox was awarded the contract to be the lead ship design agent.<12> The total cost of the first ship was put at US$1.1 billion, the other US$778 million being for the ship's weapons systems. <11> She was laid down by the Bath Iron Works at Bath, Maine, on 6 December 1988, and launched on 16 September 1989 by Mrs. Arleigh Burke. The Admiral himself was present at her commissioning ceremony on 4 July 1991, held on the waterfront in downtown Norfolk, Virginia.



So. The destroyer currently being built costs around $1 billion or so, which is 26.5 (or so) times more expensive than the 1990 destroyers. Ka Ching.

So what can you buy these days for $37.5 million? Not much.


The two LCS ships we have cost $600+ million and $704 million each. Ka Ching.

Each of the two submarines we build each and every year cost $2.8 billion dollars a pop. Ka Ching.

The new Ford-class aircraft carrier costs $11.5 billion sans people or airplanes. Ka Ching.

F/A-18 fighter bombers cost $68 million a pop. Ka Ching.

MV-22 Ospreys cost $70 million a pop. Ka Ching.

National Security Cutters cost $536 million a pop. Ka Ching.

F-22 Raptors cost $355 million a pop. Ka Ching.

F-35 Lightnings cost $239 million a pop. Ka Ching.

Don't forget it cost us (you and me) $1 million dollars per boot on the ground in Afghanistan per year. Ka Ching.

The cost of delivered gas in Afghanistan costs around $400 dollars per gallon. Ka Ching.


And now you have a good idea why we are spending almost a trillion dollars a year on the Department of Defense War.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC