You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So much for MSNBC being the liberal Fox News [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:03 AM
Original message
So much for MSNBC being the liberal Fox News
Advertisements [?]
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201006160007


So much for MSNBC being the liberal Fox News

June 16, 2010 9:02 am ET by Eric Boehlert


The constant claim from right-wing media commentators that MSNBC is just like Fox News, only liberal, has never made any sense. MSNBC is supposedly a liberal Fox News because it employs a handful of hosts who identify with liberal, or Democratic politics? But how does that compare to Fox News, which only employs hosts who identify w/ conservative, GOP politics.

Of course, MSNBC does straight news during the day, whereas Fox News hasn't done straight news in several years. Most importantly, MSNBC doesn't just make stuff up. Fox News does. All. The. Time.

But for anyone who needed additional proof that MSNBC is not the liberal Fox News (i.e. MSNBC is not an appendix to a political party), last night's coverage of Obama's primetime oil spill address was a perfect example. As has been noted, MSNBC's talking heads, including Keith Olbermann, did not give the speech high marks.

Some highlights:

{Chris} Matthews compared Obama to Carter.

Olbermann: "Nothing specific at all was said."

Matthews: "No direction."

Howard Fineman: "He wasn't specific enough."

Olbermann: "I don't think he aimed low, I don't think he aimed at all. It's startling."


Tough stuff.

Now, can you imagine the Fox News crew of paid pundits (Brit Hume, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, etc.) covering a primetime speech by a Republican president and, just moments after its conclusion, thoroughly trashing the effort as being ineffectual and uninspired?

Of course not, because that would never happen. (People would lose their jobs.)
Why? Because Fox News is the Opposition Party. It's entirely vested in the success of one political party, which is why it can't afford to practice actual journalism. i.e. Because the truth might occasionally seep out.

So next time a conservative insists MSNBC is the liberal Fox News, ask them to point you to the time when Fox News pundits trashed a GOP president in primetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC