Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDA called 'defenseless' against bad drugs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Champ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:03 PM
Original message
FDA called 'defenseless' against bad drugs
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The American public is "virtually defenseless" if another medication such as Vioxx proves to be unsafe after it is approved for sale, a government drug safety reviewer told a congressional committee Thursday.

"I would argue that the FDA as currently configured is incapable of protecting America against another Vioxx," said David Graham, who warned that the arthritis drug had been linked to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

He told the Senate Finance Committee that there were at least five other drugs on the market today that should be looked at seriously to see whether they should remain there. He cited the acne drug Accutane, the weight loss drug Meridia, the anti-cholesterol drug Crestor, the pain reliever Bextra, and the asthma drug Serevent.

Vioxx's maker, Merck & Co. pulled the drug from the market on Sept. 30 after a study indicated the popular painkiller doubled the risk of heart attacks and stroke when taken for longer than 18 months.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/V/VIOXX_SAFETY?SITE=AZPHG&SECTION=HOME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. but
we're safe from terrorism, john ashcroft said so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sometimes things don't show up
until a medication is released for sale and used by a great number of people over a long period of time.

What makes the Vioxx case different is that the FDA knew the drug had a serious problem (death) over two years ago and had been rendered too toothless even to force a relabeling of it, much less a withdrawal.

Expect much more of this stuff. The GOP despises any government agency that acts for the public against the power of the corporate, and will weaken them all to the point that they become rubberstamps for anything a corporation wants to do to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. These are the same incompetent morons that
wont let drugs in from canada because they might not be "safe".

Not safe for the profits of the pharmacutical overlords no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trailrider1951 Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the bottom line, the honest to god truth of the matter:
The FDA was set up to protect US, the American public, from the dishonest, profit-hungry purveyors of snake oil and tainted food. Today, its mission is to protect the PROFITS of the meat and dairy industry ("we don't need no mad cow testing"), the pharmaceutical companies ("really, we didn't know that vioxx was killing people"), the insurance companies ("what we really need is TORT REFORM, so that doctors and hospitals and HMOs are protected against the lawsuits of BAD patients whose wrong leg was amputated"). Welcome to life in Corporate America. Government of the corporation, by the corporation, for the corporation, amen.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. but at least
we are protected from two softball coaches marrying. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. it is Fascism
plain and simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Merck CEO's campaign contributions (in detail)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. FUCKING FASCISTS
:grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Add weakened adm. agency oversight to tort reform
and you have a recipe for wholesale disaster. 1900 (pre-regulatory agencies, pre product liability jurisprudence) anyone? This, of course, is part of their reactionary agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC