Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Round 5 may mean more base closures

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 08:49 PM
Original message
Round 5 may mean more base closures
Round 5 may mean more base closures

Pentagon: Chance to reshape defense

By Otto Kreisher
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

November 22, 2004

WASHINGTON – With the last obstacle to another round of base realignment and closure apparently removed, the Pentagon is preparing for what it considers "the best, and perhaps the last, chance to reshape defense for decades," according to an official deeply involved in the process.

(snip)

The 1988 law that authorized the process expired after the fourth round in 1995. Since then, Congress has blocked repeated administration efforts to renew the law, which cut through a wall of restrictions that had stopped all major changes to bases for a decade.

Most of the California delegation opposed another round of base closings because the state was hit hard in the four previous rounds. For example, San Diego County lost the Naval Training Center and several research facilities and saw Miramar Naval Air Station transferred to the Marine Corps.

(snip)

During the presidential campaign, Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry said he would postpone base closure if he won. With that prospect gone, the Pentagon is working in secret to produce the list of recommended closures and realignments that Rumsfeld must submit by May 16.

More..

Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041122/news_1n22dubois.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. who needs bases...
all our troops will be on foreign soil fighting anyway...

(gag!)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Base closures are a huge burden on communities.
Here in our county we lost an Air Force base several years ago. To date, many of the buildings are falling into decay because they can't be renovated (due to the cost of asbestos removal.) Additionally, there are huge tracts of land there that are contaminated with hazardous materials that have not been cleaned up by the federal government.

The federal government won't deed the land over to the city--they simply gave them a 90 year LEASE so they can "re-claim" the lands if the military feels it needful at any point in time. Every lease on that property is signed with a clause that you can be moved out if the feds want it...

The city has been faced with a huge burden already, and if the feds want to just bail on the responsibility to clean up the mess they can do it--leaving the mess to the locals.

Property values have plummeted and the property taxes have gone thru the roof just to replace the revenue lost from that base.

I have only begun to talk about how awful it is for any area that has a base closure...

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. 14 shining new bases in Iraq.
Why don't we close those?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. And in the south...
One of the ways that the repukes campaigned against Kerry was to spread the rumor that he was gonna close bases.

No shame, those fuckers. No shame at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sin verguenza
is a word which means without orlacking in shame.

A sinverguenza pretty much means a person described above.
Now, lets see YOU use it in a sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC