Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Halliburton wins MoD vote for £4bn Royal Navy deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:24 AM
Original message
Halliburton wins MoD vote for £4bn Royal Navy deal
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/story.jsp?story=588854

( and the beat goes on...)

By Katherine Griffiths and Michael Harrison

02 December 2004

A senior procurement official within the Ministry of Defence is understood to have recommended that the contract to oversee the £4bn construction of two aircraft carriers for the Royal Navy is given to Halliburton, the controversial American company once headed by the US vice-president Dick Cheney.

Professor Roy Anderson, the MoD's chief scientific officer and chairman of its Investment Approvals Board (IAB), is understood to have written to colleagues backing the bid submitted by the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR).

Provided the full IAB endorses Professor Anderson, a formal recommendation will go to ministers before Christmas to make Halliburton the so-called "physical integrator" on the carrier project.

This could have serious repercussions for the Rosyth shipyard in Fife, close to Gordon Brown's constituency, because Halliburton is expected to press for final assembly of the ships to be carried out at Nigg, a disused oil platform yard. More than 1,000 jobs at Rosyth, which is owned by Babcock, could be under threat.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. WTF ? ...
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 08:29 AM by Trajan
We have mature shipyards laying fallow on BOTH coasts, with TENS OF THOUSANDS of shipyard employees out of work : Britain as well suffers the same moribund activity .... and somehow: Halliburton is squeezing into this work ? ...

WHEN the FUCK will they stop ? ...

GEEEZ !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. As a Brit, this makes me want to puke
£4bn would have made a huge difference to the local economy of a region of the U.K. Having the aircraft carriers built locally should have been a priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malachi Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. WTF? Does Brtian need aircraft carriers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. another
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=588828

Iraq bill hits £5bn as MoD says troops will stay after poll
By Colin Brown, Deputy Political Editor

02 December 2004

The cost of the Iraq war and other military action has risen by £520m to a total of £5bn - equivalent to 1.5p on the standard rate of income tax.

The soaring cost of Britain's emergency military operations abroad was disclosed last night by Chancellor Gordon Brown, who is expected to have to raise borrowing substantially in the pre-Budget report today to cover rising public expenditure.

The Chancellor said he was setting aside an extra £520m in the special reserve to pay for the additional costs. MPs said last night that the rise would be enough to pay for three general hospitals or 20 schools.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC