Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Amy Goodman Interviews Jesse Jackson on Election Recount

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 06:04 PM
Original message
Amy Goodman Interviews Jesse Jackson on Election Recount
Presidential Election: Amy Goodman Interviews Jesse Jackson on Election Recount
By Democracy Now!, Rush Transcript

AMY GOODMAN: Reverend Jesse Jackson, what have you been doing in Ohio?

Why do you feel that a recount could change the outcome of the presidential election?

JESSE JACKSON: Well, this is November 30 -- 28 days later and the election has not been certified. The judge will not order a recount because there has not yet been a count. Therefore, we need a full and thorough federal investigation. For example, in the spring of the year, a provisional ballot, you could vote any place in the county. By September, by November, Secretary of State had shifted it to you only vote in the precinct, and with some precincts changing, it created big frustrations. So 155,000 ballots haven’t still been counted. There are many thousands not yet processed -- overcount and undercount. You have a case in Warren, Ohio where they declared a Homeland Security alert. I mean no building in Warren is over three stories high, yet they locked out the press and independent observers. Another case that I found to be astounding which I am sure Cliff can talk about, is a black woman, Ellen Connally ran for state Supreme Court judge. In Cuyahoga County, in Cleveland where she is best known, Kerry got 170,000 more votes. Elsewhere in the state, around Hamilton County, Cincinnati, Butler, Clermont, where she is least well-known, she got 190,000 more votes than Kerry. Now, that smells. We need a thorough investigation with forensic computer experts to see were there any tampering in those machines where there's no ability to do an audit trail. Then we need to consider the recount. We first need to have a count.

AMY GOODMAN: I am looking at Juan Gonzalez’s piece. This may coincide with what you are talking about. He says in the fourth ward on Cleveland's east side, two fringe presidential candidates did surprisingly well. In precinct 4F located at Benedictine High School, Martin Luther King Drive, Kerry received 293 votes, Bush 21. Michael Perutka, the candidate for the ultra-conservative Anti-immigrant Constitutional Party, an amazing 215 votes. That many black votes for Perutka is about as likely as all those Jewish votes for Buchanan in Florida's Palm Beach County in 2000. He says in virtually all the precincts that he looked at, Kerry's vote was lower than Al Gore's in 2000 even though there was a record turnout in the black community this time and even though blacks voted overwhelmingly for Kerry. Cliff Arnebeck, can you explain further what this pattern is? Is it a pattern?

CLIFF ARNEBECK: Yes, there's a pattern of extensive irregularity in the Ohio election. And in contrast to the conventional election count that's going on now, we have exit polls which are conducted by news organizations, hiring professionals using scientific methods to count the votes and those exit polls showed Kerry winning the Ohio election. So, when you compare those exit polls with the counting that's been going on through this partisan process, it seems pretty clear that we have a serious issue here about who won this election. And the conclusion, drawn on the day after the election, that Mr. Bush won the election, is very much in doubt.

AMY GOODMAN: Reverend Jackson, Democracy Now! just went to Spain and Italy and on one of the main TV stations called RAI in Rome, the interviewer asked about the election and I said, “Well, really we don't really know who won.” And his eyebrows raised very high and he said, “Excuse me. Kerry conceded. Haven't you heard?” Now what about this, Reverend Jackson? What about Kerry immediately conceding?

JESSE JACKSON: The early concession betrayed the trust of the voters. We have a moral obligation and a legal obligation to see that every vote counts and whether Kerry gets the most votes or not, we must break a precedent of fraudulent elections. For the Secretary of the State, in fact, can be the co-chair of a campaign and run the process -- that's like a team owner of a baseball team being the umpire at game seven of the World Series. You can't be a team owner and be a referee at the same time. You can't have Katherine Harris and Ken Blackwell as chairs of the campaign and in charge of the process. It taints the credibility of the process at the very beginning.
more
http://www.ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1135&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. My two favorite spokespeople for the left...
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 06:08 PM by Richardo
Not. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitySky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well I think it's amazing.
Thanks for posting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. MUST SEE! Cliff Arnebeck Link on C-Span re: FRAUD!!!
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 06:19 PM by seemslikeadream
Call-In
2004 Presidential Vote in Ohio
C-SPAN, Washington Journal
Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
ID: 184644 - 2 - 12/02/2004 - 0:30 - No Sale

Arnebeck, Cliff, Co-Chairman, Alliance for Democracy

Mr. Arnebeck will talk by video link from Columbus, Ohio about the 2004 presidential vote in Ohio. Later in the day, he is filing a lawsuit at the Ohio Supreme Court challenging the presidential election in Ohio. He will respond to telephone calls, faxes, and electronic mail from viewers.


http://www.c-span.org/homepage.asp?Cat=Series&Code=WJE&ShowVidNum=6&Rot_Cat_CD=WJ&Rot_HT=205&Rot_WD=

interview starting at 34:00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes. Arnebeck was VERY impressive.
He inspired me to believe that something really substantive is possible. The investigation into voter fraud may very well be of historical proportions because the outcome could change the very direction this country is headed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexisfree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. that's my girl!!!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes....this is a MUST SEE! Thanks for the link and the prompt about it.
I can now see the strategy for how they are hoping to contest Ohio.. Arnebeck was good to listen to. Very thoughtful and well spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC