Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tell truth on troops' stay, says Feinstein

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:35 PM
Original message
Tell truth on troops' stay, says Feinstein
Tell truth on troops' stay, says Feinstein
She implores Bush to acknowledge need will last years

Edward Epstein, Chronicle Washington Bureau

Saturday, December 4, 2004

Washington -- Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, fresh from what she called a "very sobering'' one-day trip to Iraq, challenged President Bush on Friday to "tell the American people the truth'' that large numbers of U.S. forces would have to stay in Iraq for several years.

Feinstein was one of four senators who flew to Baghdad and Fallujah on Thursday to meet with American commanders and soldiers and Iraqi leaders. She said the experience of being shuttled around Baghdad by heavily armed guards while wearing an armored vest inside an armored vehicle and flown to and from Fallujah at 100 feet above ground in a Blackhawk helicopter showed that security in the Sunni heartland of Iraq remained a major challenge 1 1/2 years after Saddam Hussein was ousted.

Feinstein, who voted in October 2002 for the resolution authorizing Bush to begin military operations in Iraq, said the president's decision this week to increase U.S. forces in Iraq from 138,000 to 150,000 before the scheduled Jan. 30 Iraqi elections was "long overdue.''

But she said the president must tell the American people that troops would have to stay in Iraq "for a substantial period of time.''

"The rumor in the souk (the marketplace in Iraqi towns) is that we'll start to pull out after the elections," the Democrat said. "I believe the American people have to be told the truth.

more...
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/12/04/MNGNOA6JR61.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. DINO....
And my senator, to my everlasting shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's still one thousand times better
than the majority in the Senate. Including the two asswipes in my state. I wish she was my Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ya got that right "Boomer Sooner" Gal :-)
I'd take Feinstein over Allen and Warner (R-VA) anytime. Warner isn't too bad ... tries to be fair but right wing fossil attitudes prevail ... but when Allen opens his mouth to speak I'm embarrassed for my state. :(

BTW I hope the day will come again when I can once again claim the Nebraska Cornhuskers without ridicule. <blush>

Go Big Red!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. and those asswipes
are such idiots. I am almost embarrassed to say I am from Oklahoma. I got out to a blue state.

Leftofcool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Ditto, I'd take her over either of mine, too
Here in Texas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynx rufus Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Is she coached by Lo Blow Lieberman?
Does she wear a "W is my President" lapel pin?
Why isn't she demanding our withdrawl from Iraq ASAP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Di Fi betrayed her constituents big time with her IWR vote....
Calls and letters to her office were something like 95 percent opposed. Even her staffers seemed stunned after her vote. She'll never demand withdrawal from Iraq-- her husband profits from military contracts, and she bears the same IWR stigma that John Kerry bore. Given her position on the Senate Intelligence Committee, she either KNEW the pre-war justifications were lies and voted to approve anyway or she has participated in the post-war whitewash to cover dubya's ass (and her own, in the bargain). Personally, I think she knew, but thought it would be a quick little war generating a national patriotic love fest that all the pols who approved would benefit from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Please. Schumer and Clinton voted for IWR, too.
I don't suggest either one of them run for higher office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Diane, or our local republican as many of us call her,
responded to a pre-war email by saying 1) She had special secret knowledge that I didn't have and 2)Diplomacy had failed. "So, now we must go to war."

Imagine her chagrin when they published parts of the pre-war NIE *with* all the qualifiers. Mendacity.

Why do I think I remember that her husband's company got a contract to build Centcom?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I also remember her saying or hinting that she had secret knowledge.
She bought the repuke propaganda hook, line, and sinker on
the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountebank Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just can't forgive her for her IWR vote.
It was widely reported that she was receiving thousands of e-mails, letters, and phone calls from her constituents urging her by a ratio of something like 20:1 to vote AGAINST the IWR. (I personally wrote three and had one of them signed by 20 people in my department at school.) In the end, she cited secret evidence presented to her in the Senate and voted for the IWR completely against the will of her constituents. Of course that evidence we now know was completely bogus. Yet, to my knowledge, she's never given a proper accounting of her decision.

There is no way she's getting my vote in the next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Write On mountebank! DiFi needs to give an account of her vote!
I am with you all the way!

Dump Diane!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hangloose Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. So what is the solution? More troops, less troops, no troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. NO TROOPS
Pack them up and bring them home.
Before another one dies.

:mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Absolutely, lets not do the Vietnam solution throwing more troops
at an non winable war. Our children deserve better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Oh that'll be fun to watch..
.. I think it's time for people to wake up and smell the brew. The US is entrenched in Iraq, and is going to be for quite a while. By removing Saddam, they've pretty much taken over his role as supressor. There are 3 major fractions in Iraq, all whom are eager to get the power, and they're not afraid to do whatever it takes. What do you think is going to happen to Iraq if the US pulls out all of their troops?

The only thing I can imagine is that the 3 fractions will descend on each other, each trying to come out as the sole survivor. Who knows how many terroists will be going to Iraq to recieve some real training. Training that I'm pretty sure they'll be happy to apply to the US.

The only thing the US can do now, is to get the UN/NATO/EU in on this, since they're the only ones who have a somewhat larger fraction of the military that the US has. This is the only thing that can prevent more US troops being deployed there. The US forces that are there, had better cancel any magazine subscriptions, because they ain't going to be leaving any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why is it so hard to say you were wrong???
I am so sick of this bullshit about more troops. More troops will just mean more killed and for what??? Sen. Feinstein and the rest who rolled over for the IWR need to come out and say they were mislead by chimpass*, that the US occupying a country is WRONG and it is time to bring the troops home NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. leftchick, your comments are always on the mark!
I also like your news posts!

Keep it strong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. why thank you Barkley!
Edited on Sat Dec-04-04 08:49 PM by leftchick
That was very kind.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. There was a soldier at my work today.
I guess he made it home for Christmas. He said he should have been out of the military 6 months ago, but they won't let him out and he's ready to retire. They are sending him back to Iraq.

He said we'll never be out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ha ha, good one, Dianne!
Why would this administration suddenly start telling people the truth? Lying has worked so well so far, and you know damn well the popular media aren't going to say anything about it. And three days from now, you won't be saying squat-ah either. Are you, Senator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. FU Di Fi
Your vote helped this situation to come about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. She's a DLC member and has a huge military presence in her state.
While it was brave of her to fly in to Iraq, nevermind Fallujah (!!), it's too bad she had a hand in making all those people die.

My senator. Hmmph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SleeplessinSoCal Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. The difference between Nam and Iraq
Is that we've created a monster in Iraq. What Feinstein wants will probably lead to a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. I won't vote for "DiFI" again, I hope Barbara Lee runs for Senate and
Barbara Striesand takes on Arnold in '06.

DiFi needs to demand an exit strategy from Bush not more troops.

Pell grants for low-income college students are being cut but money for troops in Iraq is increasing.

What message is our government sending to poor people?

I teach college in California. California's higher education system is in trouble.

I have students working two and three jobs and taking full loads.

And California has a relatively inexpensive system.

Military contracts are important to California's economy but oil is more imporant too; California gets 20% of its oil from Iraq.

We also have several large military bases in San Diego.

DiFi like Hilary is planning to run nationally; they need red-state appeal to win in the backwards areas of the nation.












Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. She wants lots of war and lots of troops. Can't imagine why!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC