Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush plan to streamline forest rules nears completion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 12:58 PM
Original message
Bush plan to streamline forest rules nears completion
WASHINGTON (AP)


The Bush administration, brushing aside concerns from environmentalists, is pushing forward with plans to give national forest managers more flexibility to approve logging and commercial activities, with less environmental review.

The final forest management rules will be reviewed by the White House's Office of Management and Budget before going into effect this fall. A draft was obtained by The Associated Press.

The new rules would overhaul the landmark 1976 National Forest Management Act, which sets the basic rules for management of the nation's 155 national forests and protects forest wildlife. ---

The final rules would leave intact some of the most controversial proposals from a draft plan released last November. Like the draft, the final plan would give regional managers of the Forest Service more discretion to approve logging, drilling and mining operations without having to conduct formal scientific investigations known as environmental impact statements. ---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe he intends to 'streamline' the Rockies
They will be much more aerodynamic once the trees are all removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. should read: Bush plan to clear cut forests nearly complete
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. 'Streamline.' Classic corporate jargon meaning "CUT"
Whenever an enterprise says it's 'streamlining,' you can bet it involves cutting things--usually jobs. See: 'right-sizing'--one of my most hated examples of corporate doublespeak.


But, what else would you expect from "America's first CEO President?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dead fish, silted rivers, floods......
Worse fires, timber-industry handouts, etc, etc...
"Only YOU can prevent forests!" new Motto of the Bush* Admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LauraK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't forget drinking water! The forests purify the water.
All major cities are planning to reforest drainage areas worldwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. In today’s L.A. Times…shrub’s policy gets blasted
State Official Deplores U.S. Forest Management

<http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-sierra9sep09,1,3734354.story?coll=la-headlines-california>

A top California environmental official complained Monday that the Bush administration insists on having its own way in its forest policies and ignores state input on management of the Sierra Nevada.

"They have this cowboy mentality — just leave us alone to manage the forests the way we want to," said Mary Nichols, secretary of the California Resources Agency. "And that winds up with more lawsuits and more risks It's a policy that is destined to fail."

"You don't want to be in a position of publicly attacking an agency that, in many respects, has tried to be a good partner They are being told they have to go back to a program of selling off more of the forests for timber production and the excuse is, 'We can't afford to let these areas burn.' "


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treefrogjohn Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Trees are terrorists
Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 02:47 PM by treefrogjohn
Yeah. That's the ticket. That's how we'll explain why they all have to go. Thanks for the idea, Karl.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ed Muskie must be spinning in his grave
Look what they've done to my trees, ma.
;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC