Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio weighs electronic, punch voting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sled Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 06:41 AM
Original message
Ohio weighs electronic, punch voting
Ohio weighs electronic, punch voting

http://tinyurl.com/43qcy

Monday, December 06, 2004

Julie Carr Smyth and Mark Naymik
Plain Dealer Reporters

Columbus

(snip)

Among the most worrisome electronic machine anomalies in the state was
an addition error in a Columbus-area precinct where votes are cast on
electronic machines made by Danaher Controls. That error gave 3,893
extra votes to Bush.

Also, electronic machines - celebrated for being more efficient than
punch cards - did little to prevent long lines in Columbus and other
parts of Franklin County, where some voters had to wait for several
hours on Election Day.

In Mahoning County, electronic machines built by another vendor,
Election Systems & Software, momentarily reported 25 million votes, or
more than twice the population of Ohio.

(snip)

The federal voter act requires that states conduct elections using
some form of electronic voting in 2006. Most Ohio counties plan to
introduce the machines in early 2005. That will give both poll workers
and voters time to adjust before the next major statewide election -
the 2006 governor's race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go back to paper
"The federal voter act requires that states conduct elections using
some form of electronic voting in 2006."

This law will provide cover for more and more vote fraud. Sometimes the old fashioned way is the best way. It may be that the vote for the presidency (maybe senate and house as well) would have to be split off from all the other elections, on a different day, to make simple paper ballots easier to count. The position of president of a superpower with 10000 nuclear weapons is too important to be lumped in with the myriad other positions and propositions on the ballot anyway. In my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC