Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Butane lighters banned from airplanes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:51 PM
Original message
Butane lighters banned from airplanes
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/traveloutdoors/2002113341_lighters.html

By LESLIE MILLER
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Passengers already are barred from smoking on commercial flights. Now they won't be allowed to bring their butane lighters on board either.

As part of the intelligence reform bill passed Wednesday, Congress added the lighters to the long list of banned items, including scissors, pen knives and box cutters.

Democratic Sens. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota had pushed for the change for more than a year after learning the Transportation Security Administration allowed them on planes.

"When I found out that they had explicitly, in their rule, said you could take two butane lighters and four books of matches on board, I thought, 'What have they been drinking?"' Dorgan said. Matches still are allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somebody's been reading Dude, Where's My Country
I never saw this covered without reference to Moore's book before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Didn't it have something to do with blowing the tobacco companies?
I know that sounds dumb, but that's what I thought I heard.

Otherwise, what possible reason is there to suddenly need a cigarette lighter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TO Kid Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Nope, it's a safety issue
It's better to have the pax carry the lighter on board than to put it in checked baggage- that way if it bursts you'll know right away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. What's the difference?
Most butane lighters contain ~1 gram of gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalcenter Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. It was the Cig Cos
It was lobbying by the Cig Cos that allowed lighters on the plane. They wanted to make sure you could light up as soon as your off of the plane and in a smoking area not withstanding the security risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Banning butane lighters?
What has Dorgan been drinking?
Next they'll ban arms and legs on the off chance someone will know kung fu and take over the plane. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. And they're so fucking proud of theirselves too
assholes. What a fucking waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, butane is an inferior fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Mike Moore strikes again- thanks Big Guy!!!
Moore has more guts than any Democrat in office- this would not be happening if not for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. This wouldn't stop a real shoe-bomber
I always thought that shoe bomber story was odd sounding. Why wouldn't terrorists come up with a better detonator than lighting a fuse, like some kind of Saturday morning cartoon. They certainly will from here on in. This just seems like more airplane silliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ze_dscherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. False teet and glasses to go next
Later, clothes - a turrst might try to strangle or suffocate someone with his pants. Even better, why not just shackle and handcuff every passenger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wish they'd make up their forking minds....
First they ban them from your pockets and carry-on, then they decide it's safer to have them in your pockets than stowed away in the checked bags down below, now...

Glad I don't smoke anymore. Air travel is a royal PITA if you smoke. Can't carry fire, they crowd you into little airless closets called smoking "lounges" at the terminal...the time factor for long over-water flights was figured on a speed record attempt....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I smoke but think allowing any fire making devices on a plane is nuts n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. How do you think the Oxygen generators work?
Not tanks like you see old smokers dragging along behind them, but devices that burn "chlorate candles" to create oxygen.

"Candles" that were improperly packed and stowed as freight (they should not have been shipped via air) is what was blamed for the Valuejet 592 crash.

Crazy, but the candles weigh less per cubic foot of oxygen than tanks do...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh, no, I agree there are a lots of things on board that create heat
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 09:52 AM by NNN0LHI
Engines, food warmers, radio equipment, etc. I just think keeping it to the bare minimum is good policy. I don't want some nut playing with matches behind me on a plane while surrounded by jet fuel.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
makhno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Matches are still allowed
Lame, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. That makes 2 of us!
That sounds like the "Shoe Bomber"!

The less sources of flame and sparks, the better...

OT, but I see that thre FCC is considering allowing Cellie calls from airplanes. I thought that was technically impossible?
About like tying-up 100 2M repeaters from 35,000 feet, I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. Do you still get a steak-knife w/ your meal in First Class? Duh.
Next up : Bernie Kerik get the "lighters and things" concession at every major airport's exit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowroll Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. More stupid reactive security.
God, the abundance of idiocy in this administration and this country in general. How is this making anyone any safer? All of this crap just creates delays, frustration and frictional costs. Ban butane lighters? You can still light a detonator with matches. Ban matches? Tape 'em to your nuts-they won't set off a metal detector and even if TSA went to a grab-you-groin-and-squeeze search you'd probably get thru.

The only way this kind of security would have any effect would be if they stripped everyone naked at the gate, gave them a cavity search and issued them hospital gowns to wear on the plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well, we are obviously being "too negative"
...because we fail to see the OPPORTUNITY in all this. See, because of this rule, FREEDOM IS ON THE MARCH for the many unemployed who got their pink slips in the last month. I'm sure they can make a killing selling butane lighters at the arrivals terminals, trotting about with those "cigars, cigarettes, Tiparillos" boxes (and maybe a perky little outfit) out at the airport curb and whilst people are waiting for their bags to come out of the belly of the aircraft.

Such opportunity for all of them there 'on-ter-pre-noooooors' who want to do some 'hard work!'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. I hate flying any more
No wonder the fucking airlines are dying. I will do **anything** to avoid flying, but, sadly, I can't. I have managed to expand my "drive" or "train" radius, but some trips just are not possible without flying.

It is degrading, tense, intrusive, and an all around fucking nightmare.

What the FUCK is WRONG with people?

The regime of Chimpus Khan enters and all semblance of COMMON FUCKING SENSE departs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. Fly naked...no baggage or carry on.. That's the solution..n/t
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well, while I think that this is stupid, at least it show that somebody
Somewhere has brains, probably an ex-Weatherman who went into goverment security. Yes, butane lighters are dangerous, and yes, you can turn one in an impressive little shrapnel bomb, especiall if it is a metal clad lighter.

This is an old trick I learned from a friend of mine who turned seriously radical in the sixties, and this information was later confirmed by the lawsuit against Bic in the eighties over their exploding lighters. Pry out the valve stem from a lighter, spark and throw QUICKLY.

So it looks like somebody somewhere remembered the lessons of their youth, and decided to put them to use. Next up, no cellophane tape and mothballs out in the parking lots of airports(see if somebody figures that one out).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC